Ending the superpower privileges in the UN
The United States, wielding the superpower privileges in the UN, is brazenly undermining the United Nations by pushing to supplant it with Donald Trump's self-styled Board of Peace—a glittering assembly of billionaires and handpicked elites.
Enhanced Multilateral Pressure Vs Superpower Privileges?
Without the veto, UN resolutions could pass more easily on issues like climate change or trade disputes, where the U.S. has historically diverged.
This might compel the U.S., under Trump or similar leadership, to negotiate alliances rather than act unilaterally, as isolation could harm economic interests and global standing, prompting a shift from perceived “rogue” policies to collaborative diplomacy.
Accountability Through Majority Rule
Ending vetoes would democratize decision-making, allowing broader coalitions to address U.S. actions, such as military interventions or sanctions. Facing potential condemnations without a blockade, the U.S. might reconsider aggressive stances to avoid reputational damage or retaliatory measures from key partners like Europe or Asia, encouraging a more restrained international posture.
Domestic Political Repercussions
A veto-free UN could amplify global criticism of U.S. policies, influencing American public opinion and congressional oversight. If resolutions highlight inconsistencies in U.S. foreign policy, it might pressure leaders like Trump to align with international norms to maintain domestic support, reducing “rogue” tendencies in favor of strategies that bolster long-term alliances and economic stability.
So, what is the UN waiting for?
Read More News on Latest Malaysia
Follow us on:
Read More News on Business News Malaysia
Read More News on SG Business News
Read More News on World Future TV
