MPI's call for 'responsible' journalism could threaten Press Freedom
The Malaysian Press Institute backs a foggy Media Council calling for responsible journalism, but I warn it may justify media regulation and limit press freedom
This press release from the Malaysian Press Institute (MPI) emphasizes responsible journalism, focusing on truth, integrity, and ethics. However, while these are essential values, the statement presents a somewhat limited or idealistic view of the role of a free press. Here are some critical perspectives on its claims:
Overemphasis on Trust can lead to control
The press release argues that trust and integrity are the cornerstones of responsible journalism. While trust is crucial, an overemphasis on it can justify media regulation or censorship. Governments and institutions often frame media control as a means to ensure 'trustworthiness,' but this can lead to suppression of dissenting voices. A truly free press does not seek trust blindly, it challenges authority and allows audiences to form opinions based on diverse viewpoints.
Truth is Not Always Unambiguous
The statement suggests that journalists should only present 'the truth'. However, in many cases, the truth is subjective or context-dependent. Different sources interpret events differently, and a free media allows for debate rather than enforcing a singular version of truth. The idea that journalism's sole duty is to uncover an objective 'truth' can be used to justify the silencing of alternative perspectives.
Ignoring the Role of Advocacy and Investigative Journalism
The statement does not acknowledge that journalism is not just about reporting facts but also about holding power to account. Investigative journalism often challenges the status quo, exposes corruption, and gives voice to marginalized communities. Responsible journalism is not just neutral reporting, it actively seeks to uncover wrongdoing, even when it upsets powerful interests.
Avoiding the Question of Press Freedom
While the statement talks about misinformation, it does not mention the importance of press freedom in ensuring accountability. Many governments use fake news' laws to crack down on independent media, restricting their ability to report freely. A free press should resist external control, whether from the government or corporate interests.
Potential for Regulation to Stifle Media Independence
The statement aligns responsible journalism with the upcoming Malaysian Media Council, implying a regulatory approach. While media councils can promote ethical standards, they can also be tools for government oversight. Independent media should self-regulate rather than be subject to external regulatory bodies that may impose state-aligned narratives.
Last but not least
The MPI statement promotes ethical journalism but frames it in a way that could justify regulation and control rather than true press freedom. A free media should not just be 'œresponsible' in a way that aligns with government or institutional expectations; it should be fearless, diverse, and open to different interpretations of truth.
More WF News
Kazi Mahmood