Analysis: Navin Ramgoolam’s New Cabinet Faces Criticism Over Structure, Purpose
Mauritius’ new government faces scrutiny over an oversized cabinet and unclear reforms amid hopes for economic recovery and political renewal
Mauritius’ recent election results marked a historic moment, with the government securing all 60 parliamentary seats in a sweeping victory that ousted what many described as a repressive regime. The unprecedented celebrations that followed reflected a nation eager for change. However, questions are already mounting over whether veteran leader Navin Ramgoolam, now Prime Minister, has set the right course for the country’s recovery.
Critics argue that Ramgoolam’s cabinet choices raise concerns about his ability to steer Mauritius away from economic instability and toward reform. His decision to retain key ministries under his direct control—including finance, defense, interior, and external communications (SIC)—has drawn skepticism, particularly given his age and the breadth of responsibilities involved. Observers have questioned whether consolidating such power is prudent or practical.
And does Mauritius still need an external communications ministry in 2024?
New Cabinet?
Adding to the criticism is the size and structure of the cabinet itself. Nearly half of the parliament has been appointed as ministers or junior ministers, sparking speculation that these appointments are less about functionality and more about maintaining political alliances.
Ministries such as finance and financial services, as well as sports and arts and culture, have been split into separate entities, despite overlaps in their mandates. For example, the Ministry of Land—historically tied to past controversies under Ramgoolam—remains intact, even as its necessity is being questioned in a geographically constrained nation.
Reform-minded critics note that the cabinet’s composition lacks clear direction for addressing pressing national issues, such as economic recovery, social justice, and freedom of information. The addition of a Ministry of Gender Equality, while potentially a nod to international human rights and funding criteria, has been interpreted by some as symbolic rather than transformative.
Ramgoolam's future
Ramgoolam faces an uphill battle to prove that his administration can deliver on the promises of renewal that swept him to power. His cabinet structure, rather than signalling a bold reform agenda, appears to be a holdover from past political eras, designed to appease disparate factions rather than streamline governance.
The early days of this administration will be critical in determining whether Mauritius can overcome its challenges. As optimism from the election fades, the country will look to Ramgoolam to deliver substantive reforms and chart a path forward. The stakes could not be higher, and the honeymoon period may already be over.
Kazi Mahmood