Second Hand Luxury Stores Need to Beware After Chanel’s New LAWSUIT Win
The controversial lawsuit between Chanel and What Goes Around Comes Around has been heavily debated among the fashion enthusiasts on YouTube. This may set the future precedent on how second hand retailers are dealt with selling second hand luxury goods as other brands may opt to do the same thing.
The controversial lawsuit between Chanel and What Goes Around Comes Around has been heavily debated among the fashion enthusiasts on YouTube. This may set the future precedent on how second hand retailers are dealt with selling second hand luxury goods as other brands may opt to do the same thing.
According to Vogue Business, Chanel emerged victorious in its month-long legal battle against luxury reseller What Goes Around Comes Around (WGACA). The jury unanimously ruled in favor of Chanel on all four counts, including trademark infringement, false association, unfair competition, and false advertising.
Chanel’s commitment to protecting consumers and its brand against counterfeiting and false association was highlighted. WGACA maintains its innocence, but the ruling sets boundaries for the luxury resale market and aims to safeguard consumers. The verdict may impact vetting and authentication processes, potentially increasing costs for luxury second hand retailers.’
What are the reactions towards Chanel winning a lawsuit against WGACA?
Luxury YouTuber, SuperDacob alleges that this could set a precedent on owning a Chanel bag. It could be a possibility in the future that the brand would not prefer customers to sell the bags they have purchased from them, defected or not.
It appears that a lot of fashion enthusiasts are tired with the problems these luxury brands are facing. Others speculate that if a restriction on handbag resale were to happen, the value of the bags may drop as a customer would not even be able to sell it off.
Asir Fatagar