Kamala, the war president
Kamala Harris has the enormous potential to win the November elections in the USA in what will prove to be a major upset after the surge in popularity of former president Donald Trump Following the shooting incident
Kamala Harris has the enormous potential to win the November elections in the USA in what will prove to be a major upset after the surge in popularity of former president Donald Trump following the shooting incident
Now, is the perfect time to analyse the contrasting foreign policy approaches in the USA. There is Trump’s foreign policy approach and sure, there is the little-known Kamala Harris’ policies.
Read More WF news
Asir Fatagar
Trump’s foreign policy
Prioritizing Peaceful Resolutions
Former President Donald Trump’s foreign policy has been characterized by a strong emphasis on negotiations and peaceful resolutions of conflicts.
During his tenure, Trump brokered the Abraham Accords, a series of normalization agreements between Israel and several Arab nations, including the UAE and Bahrain. These agreements marked a significant shift in the Middle East, aiming to reduce tensions and promote cooperation.
Trump’s administration also engaged in direct talks with North Korea, showcasing a preference for diplomacy over military intervention. His approach often involved a transactional view of international relations, prioritizing American interests and reducing U.S. involvement in overseas conflicts. These were breakthrough events on the global scene.
Democratic Party’s Stance: Support for Ukraine and Israel
The Democratic Party, under the Biden administration and with Vice President Kamala Harris as a prominent figure, has maintained a more traditional approach to foreign policy. This includes strong support for allies like Israel and a commitment to international alliances.
The Democrats have been vocal in supporting Ukraine in its conflict with Russia, providing military aid and advocating for a strong international response to Russian aggression. This support aligns with a broader commitment to upholding international norms and defending democratic values.
Key Differences: Isolationism vs. Global Engagement
The key difference between Trump’s approach and that of the Democrats lies in their views on global engagement.
Trump and his allies have often advocated for a stance of non-aggression. Some calls it ‘isolationist’ because it focuses on “America First” and on reducing the U.S.’s role in global conflicts.
We see it as a positive approach since the world is now entering an age of new conflicts that may change the dynamics on the global stage.
In contrast, the Democrats emphasize the importance of alliances and multilateralism, viewing international cooperation as essential for addressing global challenges and maintaining a rules-based international order.
They also want to continue the policy of interference and will probably support the ideas that are circulating in Europe over a third world war. Will Kamala play into these plots?
Implications for U.S. Foreign Policy
These contrasting approaches have significant implications for U.S. foreign policy. A Trump-aligned policy could lead to a reduction in U.S. commitments abroad, potentially leading to a more inward-looking stance but also with an expansion of US economic help.
Some say this could impact international stability, especially in regions where the U.S. has traditionally played a stabilizing role. We say it may bring more peace and give the world a few more years to breath before the inevitable.
World War 3?
On the other hand, the Democrats’ approach could involve a more proactive role in international affairs, potentially leading to deeper involvement in conflicts like those in Ukraine and the Middle East. Thus turning the clock faster for a world war.
In summary, the foreign policy divide between the Republicans, particularly under Trump’s influence, and the Democrats is stark.
Trump’s emphasis on peaceful resolutions and reduced international involvement contrasts with the Democrats’ support for allies and commitment to a robust international presence.
These differing philosophies will continue to shape the U.S.’s role on the global stage. We are for peace!